Over at Advance for Long-Term Care, long-time administrator and educator Dr. Brian Garavaglia blames two villains for administrator turnover at skilled nursing facilities:
- Onerous government regulation
- Clueless corporate ownership
I certainly agree with him about the first villain, but not so much about the second one.
It's easy to see where heavy-handed government intrusion frustrates administrators. Federal rules and regulations, often interpreted and implemented subjectively by the states, consume, confuse and punish nursing home administrators and staff. Garavaglia focuses on the flaws of the nursing home survey process, which is all about handing out demerits instead of collaborating to improve quality of care. Add to that the maligned five-star rating system, that has mostly caused administrators undue confusion and anxiety, all without accurately assessing quality of care. And we visited a nursing home last week that was scheduling weekly MDS 3.0 training sessions from now through October to prepare for the changes, with RUG-IV looming as well. All time spent pushing paper and crossing T's, instead of focusing on patient care.
And I agree with some of what he says about how corporate ownership and acquisition of skilled nursing facilities can frustrate administrators. As happens in any industry, sometimes investors acquire companies whose business they don't really understand, and unsuccessfully apply financial and profit models that simply don't work. That's just called poor management, and it's not unique to nursing homes or long-term care.
But Dr. Garavaglia broadly asserts that every mulit-location SNF company is run by bean counters who don't understand and disregard what administrators must do to maintain quality clinical care. They bring in clueless "marketers" (the horror!) who "[attempt] to address census and to 'close sales,' similar to those who work in sales and marketing close deals in car sales."
We just don't see that with our SNF clients. I have yet to encounter a CEO, COO or VP of marketing for a SNF chain who views beds as a commodity like cars. (That doesn't mean they're not out there, they just aren't the type who seek our help in building census through automation and reporting.) In fact, many of these SNF companies target poorly performing nursing homes for acquisition, intent to turn around financial health by improving clinical care, quality of life and community reputation.
You can't keep your beds full if you can't provide quality care, and you can't provide quality care if you can't pay for the people and resources to do so. The best, most successful and ultimately profitable multi-location SNF companies place urgent emphasis on both—and should be able to retain their superstar administrators by doing so.